The FCC Received 22 Million Remarks on the Year of Allergic to Repeal Web Neutrality. Practically 18 Million Were Fake, States New York’s Attorney General.

On the year former President Trump’s Federal Communications Commission voted to reform web neutralitythe regulator has been inundated with more than 22 million comments. Almost 18 million of them were fake, along with some 40% of those originated from an influence campaign connected to the broadband business, New York Attorney General Letitia James found in a 39-page report released on Thursday.
Some 8.5 million of the fake comments used the names and personal information of actual people with no knowledge or consent, ” she added.
Web neutrality denotes the principle that broadband providers must treat all content equally, without blocking, slowing down, or charging to improve certain content. Advocates fiercely opposed its repeal, along with the attorney general stated that the broadband industry secretly funded a campaign that contributed to its own demise. Three of these firms called the”lead generators” of those attempts –Fluent, Inc.,” Opt Intelligence, Inc., along with React2Media, Inc.–have entered into settlements with the attorney general’s office.
“The settlements require the companies to pay $3.7 million, $550,000, and $150,000 respectively, due to their misconduct,” the report says. “The settlements also impose detailed reforms for any long term attempts to protect consumers and prevent fraudulent comments.”
That Astroturf campaign, since the report describes this, was in turn funded with $4.2 million from Broadband for America, an industry-funded non-profit made up of senior executives from the broadband businesses and trade groups, according to the attorney general.
“The broadband group believed this service — in combination with media outreach, social networking campaigns, and coordinated figures from the broadband business and free-market economists — will’contribute [FCC Chairman Ajit] Pai quantity and intellectual pay’ for redesign,” the attorney general’s report discovers, referring to this industry-friendly pioneer of this commission throughout Trump’s tenure. “Indeed, one broadband business executive — himself a former chairman of the FCC — informed members of BFA’s executive committee, in an email, who’we would like to be sure Pai can find those opinions so he can discuss the significant number of comments supporting his stance .'”
The broadband business participants in the report are not named, along with also the attorney general’s office says the investigation is ongoing. But the attorney general added that the workplace”has not found proof that the broadband firms or their firm had direct knowledge the lead generators that they had funded engaged in fraud.”
“As a consequence, the OAG has not found these parties violated New York law,” the report says. “But, the conduct of the broadband businesses and their lobbying company raises serious issues.”

Broadband for America’s president did not immediately respond to Law&Crime’s petition for comment.

“Americans voices have been drowned out by people of fake comments and messages being submitted to the authorities to sway decision making,” James wrote in a declaration. “Rather than actually looking for real answers from the American people, marketing businesses are luring vulnerable people for their sites with freebies, co-opting their identities, and fabricating answers that giant companies are then using to affect the polices and legislation that govern our lives. However, today, we’re taking action to root this out fraud and the impersonation that’s been corrupting the process for way too long.”
Her office’s analysis determined that almost 80 percent of these bogus comments related to the broadband industry derived by a practice known as co-registration, in which customers are offered rewards to their personal information.
“Marketing offers varied widely, and contained everything from discounted children’s movies to free trials of male enhancement goods,” the report says, embedding screenshots of representative promotions. “The broadband business generated solicitations to operate alongside these marketing offers, requesting consumers …

Connecticut Supreme Court to Decide if Gyms Discriminate Against Men by Placing Apart’Women Only’ Workout Places

The Connecticut Supreme Court grappled with questions of gender, faith, objectification, modesty, and exercise during oral arguments Wednesday in a case challenging”women-only” workout places at private gyms.
The Connecticut Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities (CHRO) sued two Connecticut fitness centers, Edge Fitness and Club Fitness, for gender discrimination against men. The CHRO alleged that the women-only divisions in fitness centers are illegal under the country’s non-discrimination law.
Connecticut’s public accommodation law, like many similar statutes elsewhere, declares it unlawful to”deny any individual… full and equal lodging in almost any area of public accommodation… because of… sex… [or] to discriminate, segregate or different due to… sex.” The legislation provides some exceptions to bathrooms and locker rooms, but also the CHRO asserts that those exceptions are not applicable special workout locations.
Edge Fitness and Club Fitness are operating women-only sections in their fitness center for years. According to the court document, these areas take up about 5% of the entire facility and include some exercise gear. Everything that’s offered in the area, however, can be available in each and every gym’s main physical exercise area. The clubs say these women-only places have been a selling point for membership; so many girls have reported feeling safer and much less objectified whenever they utilize their very own gender-specific exercise area.
Two guys, Daniel Brelsford along with Alex Chaplin, every filed complaints with the CHRO, alleging that they’d been discriminated against according to their gender. CHRO took the issue to an administrative hearing and lost, subsequently appealed the judgment about the men’s behalf. The guys themselves are no more included in the suit. At the trial level, CHRO lost again, since the court declared the administrative judgment, in which the referee held that”public policy regarding privacy” supported the girls -just workout spaces.
CHRO has appealed the thing up the legal chain. The matter is currently before the nation’s highest court, and it raises questions of legal precedent much outside the reach of women-only work locations.
According to CHRO’s short, the women-only sections constitute a criminal”different but equal” region of the fitness center, in violation of the Brown v. Board of Education’s famous rule.
By comparison, men are not segregated into men-only health spas places in the area Connecticut fitness centers; rather, girls are granted the option to exercise in main gym area or to voluntarily work with a women-only section. Furthermore, Brown-era cases occurred against the background of wide-scale policies of racial segregation in the American South intended to disadvantage racial minorities. The fitness centers, on the flip side, said they provided women-only areas in an effort to cater to religious Muslim and Jewish patrons whose religious belief prohibit them to work in close proximity to both guys.
These differences don’t necessarily indicate that the gym’s coverage is legal, but they do mean that the challenge is moving in a completely different context compared to scenarios the CHRO increased in aid of its position.
Edge Fitness started its short with harsh words to the CHRO.
“During a period when girls are speaking out against sexual harassment and assault in significant amounts,” it wrote, ” the CHRO”has decided not to join the attempt.”
Despite expert testimony which”Edge’s girls only areas have a beneficial effect on women’s emotional well-being,” along with the evidence that girls utilize these areas”to prevent sexual objectification,” that the CHRO asks that the court”to turn public accommodation law on its head” by finding the separate workout centers to become discriminatory.
Edge also urges the CHRO for producing the analogy to racial segregation, saying:
“[I]n a truly shocking debate in support of its …

On the Newest’Coptales’ Podcast:’ Sgt. Sean’Sticks’ Larkin Interviews His Former Informant Around Busting a Strip Club Robbery

Listen to the complete event on Apple Podcast, Spotify or where else you obtain your podcasts, and subscribe!
On the latest episode of Law&Crime’s podcast”Coptales,” Sgt. Sean”Sticks” Larkin of the Tulsa Police Department’s Crime Gun Unit and ICU Nurse Howard Doss sit with Sean’s old police informant.
Larkin and his previous informant”Connor”–not his real name–recount the way they have been able to prevent a strip club prosecution.
“I think they played a fighting game, and like clockwork, here they are,” Connor said. “They gotkindly wait till a specific amount to demonstrate intent of these gont do exactly what they was told that might occur. And like clockwork: It happened, and the red and blue lights came and people began scattering like roaches.”

“Connor” also discusses the way he met Sean and turned into his informant back in 2009.
“I think that the very, very, very initial information was on such as a murder defendant that they could not locate, and they was out some apartments,” Conor said. “And they was looking for a certain car and I told him what a vehicle was–and they put everything together after that.”

You can also watch the entire episode :

Have a trick we have to know? …

Devin Nunes’s Attorney Sanctioned, Ordered to Pay CNN $21,000 For Filing ‘Frivolous’ Defamation Lawsuit

A federal judge in Maryland that week followed on a prior warning to sanction a lawyer famous for representing Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) In a series of unsuccessful defamation lawsuits against media firms, saying the attorney’s most up-to-date case against CNN was”frivolous” in nature.
U.S. District Judge Richard Bennet, an appointee of George W. Bush, ruled the lawyer Steve Biss had”unreasonably and vexatiously” attempted to keep on litigating a lawsuit against the information community after the case had already been dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a claim in March. Despite that ruling, Biss filed an amended complaint which the court moved on to describe as”nothing more than a replica of the first complaint without a new material factual allegations.”
The first complaint — filed on behalf of Nunes’s senior aide Derek Harvey against CNN, former Rudy Giuliani business associate Lev Parnas, and Parnas’s lawyer Joseph Bondy — stemmed from a November 2020 CNN report which said Parnas was ready to supply Congress with testimony in connection with Donald Trump’s first impeachment proceeding. CNN reported that Parnas would testify, in consequence, that Nunes fulfilled with former prosecutor Victor Shokin”to talk digging up dirt of Joe Biden.”
From the initial criticism, Harvey alleged that the defendants falsely accused him of participating in an endeavor to aid and abet the commission of criminal, unethical, and dishonest conduct.
Harvey and Biss initially claimed that CNN left 20 defamatory statements, but later filed an amended complaint which narrowed that number down to five. But, Judge Bennet concluded that even the cut down criticism contained the same”manifest deficiencies” concerning the statements in query that lacked”defamatory meaning” and neglected to”plausibly allege material falsity” and”actual malice.”
“This Court determined Harvey and his counsel engaged in bad faith conduct in submitting the last-minute Amended Complaint in this instance, joining a’chorus’ of employees sanctioning one of their Plaintiff’s attorneys, Steven Biss,” the ruling said.
Judge Bennet concluded that CNN’s request for about $21,437 in lawyer’s fees was reasonable under the conditions.
“As this Court explained in its Memorandum Opinions ignoring the original Complaint and ultimately the Amended Complaint, this case involves the allegations of some public official seeking to collect compensation from a news organization because of its coverage of the first impeachment of former President Donald J. Trump,” Bennet wrote. “In submitting the Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, CNN’s counsel thoroughly demonstrated that, regardless of the Plaintiff’s alterations to the original Complaint, the remaining five supposedly defamatory statements failed to meet each of the needs of a defamation case.”
Bennet in February had said Harvey’s instance”closely mimicked” allegations in federal lawsuits which Biss filed on Nunes’ behalf.

Biss did not immediately respond to a request for comment. If he supplies a response, we will update this report.
Read the full ruling below.

[photograph by Mark Wilson/Getty Images]
Have a suggestion we need to know? [email protected]…

Iowa Sex Offender Charged with Murdering His Son’s 10-Year-Old Half-Sister

Press Briefing — May 5, 2021 @ 9 a.m.
Founded by Davenport Police Department on Wednesday, May 5, 2021

A sex offender at Scott County, Iowa was charged on Wednesday with killing a 10-year-old woman. Henry Earl Dinkins, 48, was already in jail when he had been accused of murdering relative Breasia Terrell.
Authorities were mum about the facts from a press conference, with Scott County Attorney Mike Walton stating they couldn’t speak about the results of the evaluation in detail due to the pending case. Nevertheless, researchers did argue that Dinkins obtained Terrell from a residence last July 10, 2020, also shot . In reacting to reporter questions, the prosecutors said that the suspect is the sole person charged, and the investigation is ongoing.
Davenport police Captain Brent Biggs expressed sympathy for Breasia’s mom Aisha Lankford.
“We cannot imagine the despair and pain that she needs to experience, and our ideas and our prayers stay with her Breasia’s household,” he explained.
Cops have said that Terrell was seen at the 2700 block of 53rd Street during the early hours of last July 10. A search for her arrived in a tragic end. Davenport police leader Paul Sikorski announced on March 31 the Clinton County Sheriff’s Department officials contacted his department about remains found close to the city of DeWitt. An autopsy was performed. It had been Breasia.
Henry Earl Dinkins and Breasia Terrell.
Dinkins immediately turned into a person’s attention. Authorities did not have to look far. The suspect was already at the Scott County Jail on an alleged sex offender registry violation; he was arrested the same day Terrell went missing. Original attorney Russell A. Dircks withdrew from the case, citing a conflict of interest: his wife taught Breasia in one of her classes.
It’s been noted that Terrell had gone missing in the flat Dinkins shared with his new girlfriend.
Dinkins is the father of Breasia’s half-brother.
The suspect stays in the Scott County jail after being locked up for months at a $25,000 bond. He has no bond in the murder case. His existing attorney in the matter involving the sex offender registry, Jack Dusthimer, declined to comment on the merits of this new case when Law&Crime reached out. But he said he wouldn’t represent the suspect at the murder and kidnapping case and did not know who would. Records reveal no attorney recorded in the matter at the time of the report.
As stated by the Iowa sex offender registry, the suspect, who had been 17 at the time of crime, was convicted in 1990 of sexual abuse in the third level. Authorities recognized the child for a woman, but did not define her age, only giving a statutory array of both”0-13.”
[Pictures via Davenport Police Department]The article Iowa Sex Offender Charged with Murdering His Son’s 10-Year-Old Half-Sister first appeared on Law & Crime.…

Federal Judge Overturns CDC’s COVID-19 Eviction Moratorium as a Unconstitutional Power Grab

Maricopa County constable Darlene Martinez signals an eviction order on October 7, 2020 at Phoenix, Arizona. Countless court-ordered evictions continue nationwide despite a Centers for Disease Control (CDC) moratorium for renters impacted from the coronavirus pandemic. Although county and state officials say they’ve tried to educate the public on the protections, so many renters stay unaware and don’t complete the necessary forms to stay in their houses. Oftentimes landlords have worked out more flexible payment plans by vulnerable tenants, although these temporary solutions have become fraught since the pandemic drags on.

The arrangement, which has just been enforced invisibly across the country due to the fact that many landlords have disregarded it and courts have been loath to enforce it, has staved off eviction and homelessness for tens of thousands of Americans. Those families now face an increasingly uncertain future.
In a 20-page memorandum view, Trump-appointed U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich found that CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky exceeded her authority when she recently issued the”Temporary Halt at Residential Evictions To Avoid the Further Spread of COVID-19″ order in early September 2020 in the behest of their 45th president.
The order was then extended and later endorsed by the U.S. Congress and present President Joe Biden.
“[T]he CDC dictate must be put aside,” the court ruled — stressing that vacating the arrangement nationwide was in line with”settled precedent” along with the relevant federal law governing administrative agencies.
Even the CDC missive, twice as revived, declared that”a landlord, proprietor of a residential property, or other individual having a valid right to pursue eviction or possessory action shall not evict any insured individual” and provided guidelines for renters to file for housing safe harbors amidst the broad and profound economic chaos resulting from the pandemic.
Three property management companies resisted because a number of the tenants ceased paying rent, invoked the protections of the CDC’s flooding moratorium, and therefore couldn’t be evicted.
The plaintiffs alleged many procedural complaints contrary to the CDC, but the D.C. District Court began and ended its analysis by finding out the agency had exceeded its authority with the order.
Judge Friedrich used the administrative law frame in the landmark case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., which can be a multiple-step inquiry that decides whether or not an administrative agency is entitled to judicial deference over its own interpretation of a statute composed by Congress.
The question’s first step is to evaluate whether “Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue,” which is another way of asking whether the statute is ambiguous or not. Only if the statute is found to be ambiguous by a court will the extra steps be contemplated. Here, the amount of steps the court permits itself to take is often determinative in the way the decision is reached.
The court’s answer to the initial question is typically dispositive. And that is what happened .
“In Chevron’s first step, this Court should use the’ordinary tools of their judicial craft,’ including canons of building,” she wrote. “All these canons confirm what the plain text reveals. The Secretary’s authority does not extend as far as the Department claims”
Judge Friedrich said the statute at issue is apparent — despite numerous attempts by the CDC to offer counter explanations for what specific provisions in the Public Health Service Act imply.
“The Department’s interpretation goes far.” The court stated. “The first sentence of [the statute] is the starting point in assessing the scope of the Secretary’s delegated authority. However, it is not the end point. Although it is true that Congress …

Federal Appeals Court Upholds Decision to Keep Proud Boy Behind Bars Ahead of Trial for Pepper Spraying Police

Christopher Worrell pepper spraying police officers during Jan. 6 Capitol Riot

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Wednesday ruled that a part of the far-right Proud Boys militia group accused of using chemical spray police during the Capitol riot will stay in jail while he awaits his courtroom.
A three-judge panel denied Christopher Worrell’s emergency motion to reconsider a month’s district court judgment. Even though it appears the court doesn’t see precedential value in the judgment (see: Circuit Rule 36, unpublished opinions), it is a very clear signal that the country’s second-most powerful court isn’t going to be more lenient in cases of Jan. 6 defendants that are accused of endangering police officers.
Worrell, that resides and was arrested in Florida, was charged in March with a litany of federal crimes including”carry[ing] a deadly and dangerous weapon” on restricted grounds. According to the charging documents, Worrell moved to D.C. using a tactical vest using a canister of gel-based pepper spray cut to the front. Video footage from that day also seemed to reveal him spraying the chemical compound at police officers trying to stymie the insurrection.
In his crisis appeal motion, Worrell contended the chemical compound wasn’t a”dangerous weapon,” and were he to be discharged he would not present a direct threat to the neighborhood.

The court drew a distinction between its initial judgment on pretrial detention for accused Capitol rioters and the circumstances at Worrell’s case.
The Circuit Court in March gave so-called”Zip Tie Guy” Eric Munchel–seen from the Senate room carrying strategic restraints–along with his mom Lisa Eisenhart an opportunity for pre-trial release in a judgment reiterating a long established principle, writing,”In our society, liberty is the norm, and detention prior to trial is an exception.”
Wednesday’s per curiam decision distinguished Munchel’s case from Worrell’s, justification the latter failed to oppose the lower court’s determination he was reckless.
“In contrast to the defendants at Munchel, as the district court here found, appellant’actually attacked police officers’ using pepper spray gel. And appellant has not shown that this finding was clearly wrong,” the court wrote. “The district court’s dangerousness determination is further buttressed by the risks against others–including potential witnesses–which appellant indicated to the FBI, as well as his membership alleged and in coordination using all the Proud Boys, a number of whose members have been imprisoned for conspiring to assault Congress.”
Additionally, Worrell on Tuesday asked the district court judge to move his trial outside Washington, D.C., claiming that”destructive” press coverage of this insurrection and”community prejudice” inside the country’s capital would unconstitutionally preclude him from receiving a fair trial.
“An investigation at Washington D.C. for Mr. Worrell are by jurors who voted almost unanimously against Donald Trump, who have been barraged with propaganda on a’white nationalist’ assault, that are told they were victims of an’insurrection,’ who were placed under curfew and locked down as a consequence, and who have been placed under seemingly endless military hold due to danger posed by’Domestic Violent Extremists,”’ the longshot motion said. “The inevitable community prejudice, and particularized prejudice against Mr. Worrell, leave the venire so heavily prejudiced against him Mr. Worrell cannot get a fair and impartial trial at Washington D.C.”
Read the entire Circuit Court judgment under.
Worrell Detention Ruling by Law&Crime on Scribd

[picture via court documents]The post Federal Appeals Court Upholds Decision to Maintain Proud Boy Behind Bars Ahead of Trial for Pepper Spraying Police first emerged Law & Crime.…

Murder Defendant Testifies That Calling His Ex-Girlfriend 49 Times on Day of Killing Was Not’Allergic Behaviour’

Joshua Aide, the Wisconsin man on trial for trying to kill his own ex-girlfriend Rebecca Borkowski and her loved buddy John Miller, in addition to killing her dad James Gruettner, denied the stand Wednesday that calling her 49 days over the day of the episode was obsessive.

#JoshuaAide — Cross: You known as Rebecca 49 times that day?

Josh: I did

Prosecutor: You would agree that is obsessive behaviour?

Josh: I would not [email protected] pic.twitter.com/WQz3EhenFM
— Cathy Russon (@cathyrusson) May 5, 2021

The defense is trying to demonstrate that the sufferers ambushed Aide, 40, and he chased back in self-defense. They maintained that this happened after the suspect displeased Borkowski by needing to sell his late dad’s house in 2019.
Prosecutors said it had been Aide who did the exact ambushing while the victims were attempting to correct a car or truck.

#JoshuaAide — Important to note, Josh testifies Rebecca had a gun pointed at him and that is why he needed to take her. We have seen body cam footage, authorities appear, Rebeeca is around the floor with a bullet in her head. No gun found. @LawCrimeNetwork
— Cathy Russon (@cathyrusson) May 5, 2021

The only thing both sides actually agree on is that the shooting happened after Borkowski, 33, ended a 5-year connection with Aide. The prior few co-owned a Tahoe that’d radiator difficulty. Borkowski said she was going to have it fixed. Miller, a 57-year-old buddy of her loved ones, came over to help that day on August 4, 2020. The suspect, however, did not need them working on the automobile.
Aide asserted on the stand that Gruettner, 59, began beating and hitting himand he fired to protect himself. He claimed to fire Miller after the man tried to hit him in the back with a thing. Finally, he said he shot Borkowski, who elevated a weapon toward him.
Obviously this is a 180 in the story presented by the natives, who said Aide showed up and started fire.

#JoshuaAide — Rebecca says they had been working on the vehicle when Josh revealed. She turned about and there was a laser pointed in the center of her brow. Second thing she knew she dropped and awakened visiting an officer. She saw her lying next to her @LawCrimeNetwork pic.twitter.com/E5glpQtUTJ

#JoshuaAide — John Miller testifies he is a buddy of James Gruettner & his wife. James asked him to work on a car because of his daughter, Rebecca. While there, the Aide showed up. He discovered”pop, pop”, turned about, red laser on his head, he was then shot. @LawCrimeNetwork pic.twitter.com/A7DdQeg97Y
— Cathy Russon (@cathyrusson) May 4, 2021

The single”conspiracy” the victims were part of has been giving Joshua’s home back to get him from Rebecca’s lifetime, the country says. In the prosecution’s case on Monday:

#JoshuaAide — Today talking what prosecutors say led to the shooting. Josh and Rebecca co-owned a Tahoe. It had work before she can get it into the defendant’s house. Josh told her to not have anybody else perform on the automobile. @LawCrimeNetwork pic.twitter.com/zRTpBNNL4Y

The prosecution pressed Aide on Wednesday regarding the dozens of telephone calls he admittedly left to Borkowski about the day of the shooting. He claimed that he had T-Mobile as a service, and did not understand when the calls went through. The country brought that Rebecca only called him three times that day, with the last call with him at 5:30 p.m.. When driving into the website of the shooting Oshkosh, from 6:36 p.m. to 8:04 p.m., Aide tried to reach 31 times. The prosecution indicated he was so angry she …

Arizona Election Auditors Check Ballots to Bamboo Fibers Following Conspiracy Theorists Claim 40,000 Votes Were’Flown in’ from Asia

Builders working for Cyber Ninjas, that was hired from the Arizona State Senate, analyze and recount ballots from the 2020 overall election at Veterans Memorial Coliseum on May 1, 2021 in Phoenix, Arizona. The Maricopa County ballot recount comes after two election Tests found no signs of widespread fraud.
The already bizarre circumstances surrounding Arizona’s controversial GOP-led audit of the 2020 presidential election became stranger Wednesday. Auditors are supposedly assessing ballots for pine fibers in an effort to confirm an absurd conspiracy theory which deceptive votes generated in Asia were somehow counted in Arizona in November.
In an interview by journalist Dennis Welch of local CBS affiliate KTVK, Tucson resident and volunteer observer John Brakey explained the bamboo concept in greater detail.
“Well, there is evidence which 40,000 ballots were hauled in to Arizona and filled into the box, fine, and it originated from the south east area of the globe — Asia — and everything they are doing is to find out whether or not there’s bamboo from the newspaper,” Brakey stated.
Then he gestured to a piece of gear that wasn’t recorded in the video interview but that was apparently used to take very substantial definition photos of individual ballots for inspection.
“That camera right there, which they [use] to take a photo of the ballot, they can really look at depth and discover out can it be a hand marked paper ballot since it is a 5k camera. You can see the folds from the ballot, because 92-percent of all the ballots here should have been trimmed because they came in through an envelope,” he stated, adding that he was”on a mission to get facts.”
Welch subsequently asked Brakey, who specifically stated that he didn’t believe the bamboo-fraud concept, why auditors might be considering locating bamboo.
“Since they use bamboo in their newspaper processing,” Brakey responded, specifying by”they” he meant”folks in South East Asia.”
“I do not believe any of that,” Brakey added. “I am only saying that is part of the puzzle we wish to un-gaslight folks about and that is a way to do it”

John Brakey, a formal assisting oversee the audit of the 2020 Arizona election,” says auditors are looking for bamboo fibers due to a baseless accusation which 40K ballots out of Asia were smuggled here. #AzAuditPool pic.twitter.com/57UOBYIehg

Here is the rest of the interview #AzAuditPool pic.twitter.com/crdMzmSkeg

The search for bamboo fibers is only the most recent cause for concern in a record that has been growing because the GOP-led state senate declared the audit last month.
To begin with , the senate contracted Cyber Ninjas, a Florida-based consulting firm that has never worked on an election and is led by conspiracy theorist Doug Logan.
After the election,” Logan wrote a document promoting a set of debunked conspiracy theories concerning alleged voter fraud running rampant in the 2020 election. The missive was supplied to U.S. Senators prior to that chamber certifying the Electoral College votes on Jan. 6. That document, titled”Election Fraud Facts & Details,” was also promoted by”Kraken” lawyer Sidney Powell on her website under the heading”Proof of Fraud — 2020 Election.”
The Arizona Mirror additionally uttered Logan’s aid for Donald Trump’s”Stop the Steal” movement and also his penchant for conspiracies. For example, in December,” Logan tweeted the”parallels between the statistical evaluation of Venezuela and this year’s election have been still astounding.” He also accused Joe Biden of committing election fraud.
Journalists who observed the audit advised staffers which ballot counters were utilizing blue pens when just red or maybe green pens were permitted in counting chambers. The prohibition on black …

Our Very First Look at Barry Morphew Behind Bars After Arrest in Alleged Murder of His Wife Suzanne

A short time after Chaffee County, Colorado police provided their very first media statements on the arrest of 53-year-old Barry Morphew from the murder of his wife Suzanne Morphew, ” the sheriff’s office published the very first picture of the suspect behind bars.
Suzanne Morphew, a 49-year-old mum of 2 by Salida, was reported missing from a neighbor May 10, 2020 after she did not return home from a bike ride. This was Mother’s Day. Only seven days later, the defendant sat down to record some video pleading for his spouse’s safe return.

“Oh Suzanne, if anyone is out there that may hear that, that has youpersonally, please, we’ll do anything is necessary to bring back you. We love you. The women need you. No questions asked. However much they need, I’ll do anything it takes to get you back. Honey, I love you. I want you back so awful,” he said.
Now, just under a year afterwards, Barry Morphew faces costs of murder that is senile, tampering with evidence, also trying to influence a public servant.
In a Wednesday afternoon press conference, Chaffee County Sheriff John Spezze stated Morphew was”taken into custody at his residence.” Morphew was lonely in the time of the arrest and was taken into custody without incident. Spezze thanked dozens of law enforcement officials in Chaffee County, the Colorado Bureau of Investigation and the FBI because of their efforts in exploring this case. Spezze reported that police executed over 135 research warrants and interviewed over 400 people in many states.
In early Aprilthe results of the analysis were presented to the 11th Judicial District Attorney’s Office.
DA Linda Stanley and her office reviewed the case and made the decision to move forward, ” the sheriff said.
“I understand how deeply this case has influenced our neighborhood,” Sheriff Spezze said.
DA Stanley also credited law enforcement for operating in and day out with this circumstance.
“They never quit,” she said.
Stanley was asked by a reporter how the public would have confidence that there’s a strong case against Barry Morphew if police would not publish the affidavit against him.
“I would not bring costs unless I was confident,” Stanley responded.
Barry Morphew is being held in the Chaffee County detention center, ” the sheriff said. Morphew is scheduled to appear in court Thursday at 10:30 a.m. Mountain Time. He has retained a lawyer.
Asked about the alleged cause of death, DA Stanley said:”with no human body, we’d not have the ability to state that publicly.”
“We feel that [Suzanne] is not alive,” the sheriff added.
Reporters were frustrated with how little information Stanley and Spezze supplied after this significant development from the yearlong case. Authorities promised that a news release would shortly follow that included a mugshot. That’s what occurred. The news release replicated much of the Identical basic advice that was given in the presser:
He is being held in the Chaffee County Detention Facility with no bond. A mugshot of all Morphew is attached to the news release.
Morphew’s very first court date will be the advisement in which any bond discussions will be noticed. This hearing will be held in the Chaffee County Courthouse at 10:30 a.m. on Thursday, May 6. The arrest warrant is closed at this time.

The team has also researched over 1,400 tips generated from within and outside law enforcement.

In Sept. 2020,” Jeffrey Puckett, a man who was hired to do contracting work for Barry Morphew, told Fox 21 News that a Holiday Inn room in Broomfield — that Barry compensated to stay in the weekend Suzanne vanished …