Nearly 40 years following a 59-year-old widow had been brutally murdered in her home, investigators in Massachusetts have declared that the cold case has been solved.
Cruz explained that a tipster, recognized only as a pal of Aylward’s, ” reported that the day following Aylward died that the man confessed he murdered someone several years back in Pembroke, that’s where Hannon dwelt independently. Aylward was born on March 9, 1961 and died on February 3, 2020 in age 58, meaning that he was 22 years old in the time of the Feb. 1984 murder.
Aylward mugshot from 1986, Plymouth County Bureau of Criminal Investigation via WCVB screengrab
Aylward allegedly confessed to a buddy sometime in 2019–a year prior to that buddy reporting that the confession to the police and after Aylward died.
Following up on the suggestion, say police got a warrant to acquire a blood sample in the Aylward in the hospital and matched DNA to the evidence that has been found in the crime scene. Until then, police hadn’t been able to identify a defendant and Aylward was not on their radar, NBC Boston reported.
Virginia Hannon’s nephew Rich Hannon talked about the information in a media conference on Thursday.
“She’s a wonderful person, good with the kids. She had been a cook in the school. She had been just a terrific individual. Joyful,” he said. “It’s just these guys here who stood up and spent all this time doing it, and I truly want to say thank you. That is all.”
An obituary from Feb. 2020 said that Aylward”possessed his own paving and sealcoating company early on” and had a”unique personality.”
“He had been creative with building, generous to displaced folks, independent and intelligent,” it obit said. “He was an expert aide and enjoyed working on patent growth .”
Authorities said Aylward had a criminal past, according to his own 1986 mugshot, however they didn’t go into detail about that.
Unfortunately, police still do not have a definitive answer concerning the motive. One possibility raised if the killer understood the Hannon had endured $380,000. Even the DA’s office, imagining that it was not conscious of the link between Aylward and Hannon, said it did not have proof to support that the inheritance cash concept.
Richard Hannon reported that he expected that the break in the instance could dust the cobwebs from old memories, particularly in the minds of individuals who understood Aylward.
“Somebody will remember, I believe,” he explained, adding,”Somebody will be courageous enough to return.”
DA Cruz explained that he hoped investigators would be able to connect the dots, but also said we might never know exactly what occurred on the day of the murder.
“The DNA brings us to those but does not always get us exactly what occurred. I am always hopeful we are going to be able to have that information to be sure we can give some last settlement to the victims in these situations. The sufferers are something that’s never forgotten,” he said.
Have a suggestion we must know? [email protected]…
Opposing the prosecution’s surprising attempt to shut his situation without blowing off his indictment,” Steve Bannon’s attorney told a judge that his client is not trying to”re-write history” by trying to boot his fees.
“An’administrative conclusion’ that is proposed by the government is insufficient, as it indicates a temporary suspension that might be revived later on,” Bannon’s attorney Robert Costello composed in a 16-page memo. “There is no future prosecution under this indictment using a pardon,” Mr. Bannon will not be attempted in this court about the charges contained in this indictment.”
Initially reported by Law&Crime in late February, federal prosecutors declared they would try to keep Bannon’s indictment about the books after former President Donald Trump pardoned himnoting that this act of clemency”involves mediation, not forgetfulness.”
The practical effect of keeping the indictment while closing the docket is unclear, leaving some to wonder whether prosecutors had some motive to re-convene the grand jury who charged him .
Jennifer Rodgers, who invested over a decade as a Southern District of New York prosecutor prior to becoming a CNN legal adviser, advised Law&Crime in an interview for the”Objections” podcast which prosecutors could only wish to clarify the law on the reach of the presidential pardon, or they may be clearing the way for other fees that Trump’s pardon does not cover.
“It’s possible they want that indictment to endure so they don’t need to return and install all of the proof against him to control him with fresh offenses,” Rodgers advised Law&Crime.
He’s been accused of hanging a pardon to prevent Cohen from working against Trump, an allegation Costello denies.
“Simply put, there aren’t any established facts that Stephen Bannon is trying to eliminate, nor can he, if these facts were established. Stephen Bannon is not trying to protect against any business or person from forgetting history,” Costello said. “Anything that is established by means of a finding of probable cause was established and ignoring a defendant in the indictment does not eliminate the probable cause finding. We don’t understand why the Government is really worried about a probable cause finding, since it is elemental that a probable cause finding does not overcome the presumption of innocence.”
Costello concedes he found another Trump-issued pardon event that ended in an administrative closure: the prosecution of Casey Urlacher, the mayor of the tiny, 547-population city of Mettawa. He had been accused of conducting an offshore gaming ring-along with nine other people such as a veteran of the Chicago Police Department.
Judge Emmet Sullivan, who had been handling Urlacher’s situation, shut it administratively on his own based, without prosecution or defense entered, based on Bannon’s legal group.
“We submit that this determination was that the exception to the principle, and as we show here wasJudge Emmet Sullivan stated from the Flynn case, maybe not the suitable means to handle an indictment (or advice ) where a pardon was granted before trial,” Bannon’s shield memo conditions.
Prosecutors claimed that he totaled $1 million in the non-profit. The charity’s founder Brian Kolfage along with other officers Andrew Badolato along with Timothy Shea obtained no clemency and keep to wait trail.
Read the 16-page Court below:
(Stephanie Keith/Getty Images)
Have a suggestion we should know? …
The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments Monday at Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid, a case about the union rights of farmworkers. It could impact the future of anti-discrimination law and a whole lot more.
The plaintiffs in the case are just two California fruit producers that are suing more than a 1975 state law which enables union organizers to have temporary access to an agricultural company’s property throughout non-work hours. The law’s rationale would be to encourage employees’ right to unionize by enabling employees access to their own office assumptions for after-hours meetings.
California law requires agricultural businesses to allow labor organizers onto their home three times a day for 120 days every year. The state contends that the law is essential in the particular circumstance of farming: farmworkers are normally inaccessible to union organizers via other channels, and plantation properties absence parking lots or public places which other workers normally use for collecting. From California’s short:
[Farmworkers] are highly migratory, moving to follow the harvest every few weeks or months; they frequently reside in temporary housing, sometimes on their company’s home; they often lack access to modern telecommunications technology; many talk only indigenous languages; and many are illiterate in their native language. The Board’s regulation authorizes a limited number of organizers to get the property of agricultural employers, for short periods, during non-work hours, exclusively for the purpose of discussing organizing with employees, and only after notifying the Board and the employer.
It is said that regulations permitting union organizers to meet with employees on their home would be an easement that amounts to a per se”taking” — a thing which would require compensation under the Fifth Amendment.
The after-hours union meetings don’t disrupt the companies’ businesses, and the state of California is not really taking the house so to earn a Fifth-Amendment debate, the plaintiffs needed to frame their own reduction because interference with a guarantee that is Constitutionally protected. They chose the”right to exclude undesirable persons.” To put it differently, the California unionizing regulation found that the proprietors of their inherent house directly to kick people off their property.
A panel of the Ninth Circuit sided California, as did the district court. The panel said that because the law did not amount to a physical shooting because it did not”allow arbitrary members of people to independently traverse their home 24 hours per day, 365 days annually.” The panel also ruled that the statute wasn’t a regulatory taking as the only property affected was the right to exclude — and that is simply inadequate.
Currently, SCOTUS will decide whether the Fifth Amendment protects a right to exclude on par with other underlying property rights. When the justices side with all the landowners and concur that the law amounts to a taking, it would indicate the regulation can’t continue to function with no California paying compensation because of its”carrying” of the property. That’s novel in itself, but there is far more play to be had out the stadium of farming and also unionizing.
The fruit-producer plaintiffs assert that the right to exclude must take its rightful place among the most holy of protected interests: basic rights.
After a right is”fundamental,” any law abridging that right activates the highest level of constitutional scrutiny. In short, state regulations neglect nearly always fail this test, because the correct being protected was deemed basically untouchable. (Other basic rights include the right to marry, the right to privacy, freedom of religion, and freedom of assembly)
Within an email to Law&Crime, Pacific Legal Foundation lawyer Wen Fa, that symbolizes the …
Warning: Video is disturbing
Disturbing footage from Lake County, Florida revealed a guy seemingly showing off the isolated ears of their grandfather that he supposedly murdered. Kolby Allen Parker, 30 was detained on Saturday. Body camera movie backed up deputies’ accounts that he lunged at one of these after the shattered screen of their body components.
As mentioned previously, deputies said the defendant stabbed his grandfather Ronald Wells Sr., 77, to death in their house. Parker asserted they were smoking marijuana if the older man attacked him with a knife. He reportedly asserted he killed the victim in self love. Authorities known as B.S. on this. The suspect faces charges including second-degree murder.
Deputies said they discovered Wells dead to the front porch, with horrific accidents like four stab wounds to the chest, along with a”tight degloving” (removal of skin) into the ideal forearm.
The scene was stressed from the beginning. Early on, the guy identified as Parker made a short, aborted lunge from the truck prior to deputies told him to sit .
Parker failed, but the scene continued to innovate.
“Could I see your rifle safe bro?” Parker requested a deputy later on.
“No,” explained the deputy.
“I wasn’t hearing shit, was I?” A colleague asked.
“No,” explained the deputy.
Deputies discussed the whereabouts of a man they referred to as”junior.” He had been diagnosed at the criminal complaint since Parker’s uncle.
As seen on movie, the suspect responded by pulling objects out of his pockets.
“Ronnie, also Ronnie Jr. are right here,” the suspect said.
“What is that?” Said the deputy from Parker’s side.
“People are ears” said a colleague.
The experience in question starts after the 5:30-mark in the movie above.
As seen in footage, deputies previously conducted a pat-down of this suspect. He didn’t eliminate these in the time.
After the show of their ears, then the deputy from Parker’s side shot pictures, and shot the objects out of the suspect. According to movie, the deputy continued to question the suspect on the whereabouts of junior, and also whether there was anybody else inside the house.
At one point, Parker lunged in a deputy. Authorities struggled with him through the arrest, causing a mass of figures on the ground. That occurs in the 7-minute mark. Another charges against the suspect include two counts each of battery to a law enforcement officer, and resisting with violence.
Records reveal no lawyer of recordParker declined a public defender.
Have a suggestion we must know? [email protected]…
Gregory Alan Bush in 2018.
A Kentucky man pleaded guilty on Thursday to hate crime and firearm charges for murdering two Black clients at a Kroger grocery store in 2018. Gregory Alan Bush is already serving a state sentence with no parole in connection to the exact same attack.
Bush randomly shot a guy in the rear of the head using a Smith & Wisson, version 411, .40-caliber pistol, prosecutors said. He then shot the victim’s torso. The dead guy, identified as 69-year-old Maurice Stallard, had been searching with his 12-year-old grandson.
The murderer then fatally shot a girl in the mind and body out at the parking lot, before getting into shootout using a third target, a guy who survived the encounter and was armed with a handgun.
The shooting rampage took another turn after Bush crossed paths with a different guy, who was also armed. There was a very simple difference between this new person, along with also the three victims, however. The fourth person was white. The other three were Black.
“Don’t take me [and] I will not take you,” Bush said, according to authorities. “Whites do not shoot whites”
This October 24, 2018 episode proved to be a racist attack. Bush didn’t know his victims. He just shot at them because they were Black.
“It’s complete rue in our community at this time,” explained Jessica Holman, who informed that the Louisville Courier-Journal in 2018 which Stallard had been a family friend. She described him as warm and easy-going. “He’s the exact same age as my parents along with his children are my age, therefore all of us experienced a rites of passage collectively rising up. Mr. Stallard looks just like my father, and lots of times my nephew walks along with my father in that Kroger — my parents go to this shop — it’s their shop.”
The girl who perished in the parking lot was Vickie Lee Jones, 67, a retired professional administrator who’d worked at the Veterans Affairs hospital.
Nephew Kevin Gunn described her as”one of the sweetest people you might understand — and I am not just saying that because her nephew.
Bush pleaded guilty but mentally ill in state court–a classification under Kentucky law which allows for treatment behind bars–and was sentenced in December. Whatever he receives is going to be redundant because he faces a potential punishment of life sentence without parole.
“It will not bring back two pillars of the Louisville community, whose horrible and senseless deaths we contested, but we hope it transmits the message that the Justice Department will work tirelessly to bring perpetrators of bias-motivated violence to justice”
[Screengrab via WHAS]
Have a trick we should know? …
Eureka Police Officer Mark Meftah, left, Also Sgt. Rodrigo Reyna-Sanchez, Directly.
The messages included discussions of shooting a newly freed prisoner and of beating protesters.
The graphic messages were obtained and reported on by the Sacramento Bee on Wednesday afternoon. In response to inquiries from the paper, the Eureka Police Department declared that two of the officers who frequently led to the discussion Sgt. Rodrigo Reyna-Sanchez along with Ofcr. Mark Meftah — were put on paid leave”effective immediately.”
According to the report, Sgt. Reyna-Sanchez texted the band April 2020 about a suspect who had been arrested with many guns and body armor once in the ownership — paradoxically — of Reyna-Sanchez himself. After learning that the suspect been released from jail on bond, the sergeant wrote:”He had one of my tac vests that I had uttered to code authorities!! Face take the fucker!!!” That the sergeant wrote. “He had been one of my very first arrests!!! Sent him for a minute!!”
The Bee also noticed that Reyna-Sanchez really did take a suspect in the mind in 2010 in a episode that was later deemed to be justified use of force.
A month later, Meftah wrote to the group:”I am frustrated that none of you assholes appeared interested in the hot trog gender I got to interrupt in the greenbelt… I thought a creature was getting killed by a mountain lion or something from all of the crying.”
When the other officer responded by stating there were”certain things that simply don’t need to get envisioned,” Meftah composed:”Hey sexual intercourse is sex, you set that shit on front of me ima see… [a]nd I did, such as 10 minutes.”
The group was also especially combative towards protesters.
“There is likely to be a protest in the waiver from 1700 to 1900 for the’war in Iran’… affirm u all have ur riot equipment?? Gas mask, helmet, along with dude manage,” Reyna-Sanchez composed in January 2020.
“I will overcome those fucking hippies down,” Meftah replied.
He was speaking to, since the report put it,”a girl who had been known to shoplift and who had a history of mental illness.”
A screenshot of another message showed Reyna-Sanchez stating,”She sounds hot!!! Within this cold chill, I wager she got some tough nipples!!!” It is unclear from the story if he had been speaking to the exact same woman.
Eureka Police Chief Steve Watson on Wednesday released a lengthy statement he said he had been”profoundly saddened and disturbed” to know about the messages being shared amongst his officers.
“Now , I feel compelled to say the obvious. The attitudes reflected in the text messages which were shared with us do not mirror this practice. They do not demonstrate the positive changes we’ve worked so tough to achieve and they do not meet my own performance expectations for the department,” Watson wrote on the section’s Facebook page. “While we leave space for the research to disclose more information, we fully comprehended the content of their communications which were reported. And, we ask you to join us in doing the same. This is, in my estimation, the only correct way forward.”
[picture via Eureka Police Department]
Have a suggestion we need to know? …
Protracted Lawsuit Involving a self-professed”minority religion” Called the Satanic Temple and the City of Scottsdale, Ariz., Attained oral arguments before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday.
The situation, styled as Satanic Temple, Inc. v. City of Scottsdale, involves allegations that city officials unconstitutionally discriminated against the group when officials refused to allow adherents to provide an invocation before a typical city council meeting. The temple stated that the refusal amounted to a violation of the band’s rights under the anti-establishment clause and the equal protection clause of the First and Fourteenth Amendments.
The temple described itself as a”nontheistic religion with an international presence and a presence in all 50 states” using”membership… numbered in the thousands.”
After the team sought to offer a standard”legislative prayer” to some typical city council assembly, backlash ensued.
Other classes had been allowed to provide such disagreements, court documents indicate; nonetheless, the temple says that there was no formal policy without a selection process for vetting which classes would participate. The temple explained the process as”an all-comer method” that”demanded no research into the character of the speaker or the contents of the prayer.”
The temple called to be scheduled as a player; a clerk place the group in the calendar after a brief phone call. A scheduling conflict postponed the band’s engagement.
Then,”a huge public outcry took place,” the temple states in appeals court documents. “For instance, one church organized a 15,207 email attack in the span of a few hours. The subject of the form email was’No Hail Satan prayer.’ You will find other mails, also, predominately communicating the senders were upset that the invocation was scheduled. The quantity of predominately negative feedback happened City’s servers.”
The mayor reacted negatively as well.
“The mayor finds this whole event repugnant and does not condone this class, its belief [sic] or assignment,” a number of reply emails issued by a clerk stated.
The mayor also issued a statement that said,”At Scottsdale we have resolved to continue to keep our original invocations and we have resolved to send this Satanist sideshow elsewhere.” The concept was titled”Standing In accordance with Satanists. Standing For Traditional Invocations.”
Other city officials responded similarly.
The scheduling clerk that initially okayed the temple involvement finally responded with a no, on those grounds:”that the City is not likely to deviate from its long standing practice of getting the invocation given solely by representatives from institutions with a substantial connection to the Scottsdale community.”
“Later, the Mayor whined in reelection literature which he’Stopped so-called Satanists from mocking City Hall traditions using a prayer,’ the temple alleged.
Litigation ensued. The temple argued that the policy that required burial groups to possess a”substantial connection” into the city was mere pretext for discrimination.
The city framed things slightly differently in its appeals court brief.
“This is a situation about legislative salvation, an institution in this state as the founding of the republic,” the city said. “Consistent with that lengthy convention, the City of Scottsdale… has claimed that the legislative prayer clinic for years whereby religious organizations with a considerable connection to the City have been invited to give a brief invocation on behalf of the City Council prior to City Council meetings. This appeal arises from a Tucson resident’s petition to provide such an invocation despite not living in, being a part of, or having a substantial connection tothe City.
The town’s brief contended that the choice has been created by a city supervisor who was blissfully ignorant of the entrenched debate:
The uncontroverted evidence adduced through a two-day chair trial Appellants’ claims. Acting City Manager Brian …
Chance J. Seneca, 19, has been indicted by a federal grand jury for allegedly trying to murder a gay man as part of a broader plan to kidnap and murder gay men across Louisiana.
Grand jurors returned a six-count indictment from the alleged, would-be serial killer which involves violations of the federal hate crimes statute in addition to kidnapping, firearms, along with obstruction of justice charges.
A media release in the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Western District of Louisiana contains macabre details of the suspect’s alleged”philosophical plot” of hate-based carnage:
The indictment stated that on June 19 and 20, 2020, Seneca attempted to kidnap 1 guy and successfully kidnapped two additional guys through his usage of both Grindr, a dating program for gay and bisexual guys. The indictment further alleges that the suspect attempted to murder one of these men due to his sex and sexual orientation, and that the defendant intended to dismember and keep pieces of the victim’s body as trophies, mementos, and food.
“The indictment further alleges that Seneca possessed a firearm in furtherance of the hate crime, and that he tried to cover his activities by deleting communications between himself and the victim of the murder,” the press release persists.
Federal prosecutors also allege that Seneca had an”philosophical plot” to kidnap and kill gay men. Reportedly a Jeffrey Dahmer fan, the suspect is believed to have used a picture of the notorious serial killer because his Facebook profile image. Dahmer murdered and dismembered at least 16 boys and men over the course of many years beginning in the late 1970s.
Seneca, a resident of Lafayette Parish, supposedly kidnapped and tortured gay teenager Holden White at June 2020. White has been 18 at the moment.
“Everything seemed fine. Nothing sounded bizarre, and we decided after a few talking we ought to, for example, meet,” White told local CBS affiliate KLFY in early 2021. “He left the room to get something, and then he came back. When he came back, he had arrived behind me and that’s when he wrapped a rope around my throat.”
“The next thing I remember I was in the tub, and that he was trimming open my left wrist,” the amazing survivor recalled.
In the end, White had six stab wounds in his throat, a wound on the back part of his head and cuts his wrists which almost led to his hands being cut off–which has caused irreversible nerve damage. He woke up at a hospital bed following a coma.
White survived. But his attacker believed he had not. According to authorities, Seneca called authorities and said he had killed a guy.
Local authorities were originally reluctant to control their suspect using a hate crime–attributing the incident to an”argument.” White’s family was incensed since they thought their son was concentrated as a result of his sexual orientation. In late January 2021, neighborhood prosecutors tacked on a hate crime complaint to the attempted murder charge.
If found guilty on the federal charges, the defendant faces life in prison.
Have a tip we should know? [email protected]…
The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals on Thursday vacated the manslaughter conviction of former Tulsa police officer Shannon James Kepler, 60, at the 2014 shooting death of his son’s boyfriend Jeremy Lake, 19, according to The Associated Press.
The overturning of the conviction follows a July 2020 judgment by the Supreme Court from the USA, where the justices decided 5-4 that the eastern half of the Sooner State had been a Native American reservation. It had been ascertained that state officials lacked authority to care for the defendant-a white individual that the defense says is of Muscogee descent-for an action done with this property.
Authorities saw the writing on the wall for some time, with national prosecutors filing their particular case last November. Charges incorporate first-degree murder in Indian Country. This case is pending. An individual should not have the consequence for granted because condition jurors had trouble reaching a consensus at the first place. Kepler’s first 3 trials ended in a jury deadlock. He was just found guilty at his fourth moment in court, and sentenced to 15 years in prison.
Kepler testified at court every time he shot and murdered Lake after viewing the teen with a gun, according to Tulsa World. This was a self-defense claim. The couple was out walking whenever the defendant stepped out of his SUV. At least seven people stated they didn’t observe the 17-year-old with a weapon, nor visit one close to his entire body.
“I could hate you, but it is not going to change anything,” Jeremy’s father Carol Morse said in the sentencing. “Everything you did was wrong, and now you have to pay the consequences of your actions.”
The suspect’s daughter Lisa Kepler recently expressed mixed feelings of certainty ultimately supported his release.
“I think that, in this point, enough is enough,” she explained this past year, based on KTUL. “I’ve siblings that are growing up without a father, and he wasn’t a poor dad.”
Have a suggestion we should know? [email protected]…
A Minneapolis police officer removes George Floyd, Jr. from his SUV on May 6, 2019. (Picture via Minneapolis Police body video.)
The judge overseeing the murder trial of Derek Chauvin, among four former Minneapolis police officials accused of playing a part in murdering George Floyd, Jr., has ruled that some signs of Floyd’s unrelated May 6, 2019 interaction with other Minneapolis police officers will soon be allowed at Chauvin’s forthcoming trial.
Judge Peter Cahill said he’d allow jurors to find police body camera movie recorded May 6, 2019, by the time a police officer approached Floyd’s car to time Floyd is handcuffed. He’ll also allow photographs of tablets in the crack of the seat. Finally, he will allow Floyd’s blood pressure signs and readings Floyd created in hunt of a medical diagnosis.
However, Cahill also ruled that Floyd’s behavior after authorities approached him on May 6, 2019 was not admissible because it was not relevant. Cahill said that statements by the authorities pertaining to Floyd’s suspected drug usage were also not applicable.
However, Floyd’s attempt to conceal drugs on that date was applicable, the judge ruled.
“What is relevant in the May 6, 2019 case that goes on to cause of death or medical condition is basically the movie of their human body worn camera… from the time that the one officer tactics Mr. Floyd on the passenger side of the automobile, the subsequent behavior regarding eating medication — or not [and] his delay whatsoever,” Cahill said.
“Again when we enter resisting or complying, ” I do not think that’s of any result. It is denying compliance; allowing him to inject drugs” which has been applicable, the judge added.
A paramedic called to treat Floyd also can whined on what Floyd said regarding wither he ingested drugs on May 6, 2019. These statements by Floyd to the paramedic fall squarely in an exception to this rule against hearsay. The exclusion allows evidence to come into a trial if it’s uttered in an attempt to secure a medical diagnosis. The rules of evidence assume people aren’t going to lie to their physicians when looking for medical therapy and, thus, that announcements made so as to secure medical treatment are inherently dependable.
The judge will not permit testimony which Floyd was barbarous.
Defense lawyer Eric Nelson and suspect Derek Chauvin listen to the judge’s judgment. (Picture via screen capture from the Law&Crime Network.)
“The whole purpose here is that we have medical evidence of what happens if Mr. Floyd is faced with virtually the exact identical situation” he faced when Chavin and others faced him one year later:”confrontation by the police at gunpoint followed by a quick ingestion of some medication,” Cahill said. “We do not know precisely how many, however, there was an entrance he had done it in the right time of the halt. This is medical evidence.”
“The May 6, 2019 situation is only relevant to that extent,” Cahill continuing. “Mr. Floyd’s psychological behaviour, calling out to his mother — most that isn’t admissible since the emotional behavior and state of thoughts [are] not applicable. The May 6, 2019 proof is only admissible to the relevant purpose… for example of Mr. Floyd’s bodily response — his physical symptoms upon being faced in virtually the exact same situation.”
“Clearly, there is a cause of death problem here; actually, it’s highly contested,” the judge noted with respect to Chauvin’s trial.
“The fact that we’ve coronary artery involvement and coronary heart disease leads us to wonder whether there’s anything from your May 6, 2019 case that is relevant on the problem of …